Solution #4: DELAY HEP-B VACCINATION UNTIL A PRE-TEEN YEAR
The following is an excerpt from LOUIS PASTEUR CONDEMNS BIG PHARMA: Vaccines, Drugs, and Healthcare in The United States.
Solution #4: DELAY HEP-B VACCINATION UNTIL A PRE-TEEN YEAR. This is not a vaccine for infants. Hepatitis B vaccine should not be administered to infants directly after birth, unless the mother is infected with this virus and could pass it along to the child. All pregnant women should be screened for hep B infection. Recommended age of hep B vaccination should be changed to a preteen year just before high school. Notify the parents/guardians and mandate that a warning label be placed on hep B vaccines indicating aluminum levels within the vaccine exceeds FDA safety levels for parenteral aluminum, which may result in aluminum toxicity.
Other than vaccinating a newborn because of a hep B positive mother, there is no reason to vaccinate for hep B at this age. Hep B is not contagious, cannot be spread by sneezing, coughing, breathing, sharing utensils, or even hugging and kissing. It is a disease passed from one person to another by sexual contact, or by the sharing of needles when using drugs. Infants and young children do not engage in behaviors that would put them at risk for hep B disease. There is no benefit for a newborn taking this vaccine, but there is real potential for damage from the vaccine and its ingredients. The risk of this vaccine is not worth the benefit at this age. Administration of hep B vaccine at birth may confer immunity for hep B virus for 10-15 years, but this immunization protection begins to wear off at a time of life when these children and young adults most need this protection. It would make more sense to recommend this vaccine in a pre-teen year just before high school.
Aluminum levels in the hep B vaccine exceed FDA safety levels for parenteral (via injection) drugs. In fact, there is almost 14 times more aluminum in the hep B vaccine than allowable by the FDA for parenteral nutrition aluminum exposure for an 8-pound baby. While the FDA allows vastly more aluminum content in vaccines than in parenteral drugs (34 times more per FDA), parents should be made aware of these differences in FDA guidelines, and of the risks of aluminum exposure and potential toxicity to their infants.
Note: The information noted for hep B virus and related vaccines can be found on the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) website and the NVIC (National Vaccine Information Center) website.
The Problems.
Infants are being hurt and/or killed unnecessarily. After hep B vaccination was placed on the CDC recommended vaccine schedule for newborns in 1991, the ICU wards for neonates experienced an inordinate increase of hospitalizations which appear to be linked to hep B vaccination immediately after birth. No other explanation is deemed plausible.
The only reason for a newborn to be infected with the hep B virus is that the mother who is infected can pass this virus to her child during the birthing process. Therefore, any vaccine injuries or related deaths for infants caused by the hep B vaccine for other than an infected mother are unnecessary. The reason why all mothers should be screened for this virus before they give birth is to provide the hep B vaccine only when necessary. In this way, unnecessary deaths and injuries related to the hep B vaccine can be prevented.
Doing research on vaccines and their adverse events can be time consuming and confusing. The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) is the best consumer advocacy group in the United States for vaccines, and they offer excellent information and summaries of this detailed information. Using information from the NVIC:
“… as of January 26, 2024, there have been 106,256 adverse events reported to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in connection with hepatitis B vaccines… Out of the reports in VAERS there were 2,367 related deaths, 16,237 hospitalizations, and 3,729 related disabilities… 1,730 deaths occurring in children under 3 years of age.”
These hep B vaccine related adverse events, which include injuries and deaths, are large numbers, especially when compared with the number of women who have hep B virus and are about to give birth, which are very few.
These adverse events caused by the hep B vaccine are likely due to the ingredients within the vaccine, which contains aluminum and brewer’s yeast, both of which have been cited to cause health problems when taken parenterally (via injection).
Due to other problems and/or potential infections during or around the time of birth, many of these neonates are given antibiotics, which have their own list of potential adverse events associated with them. One of these common adverse events are yeast problems due to antibiotics killing off the good bacteria in the GI tract. Couple this with the additional yeast in the hep B vaccine, and you have a recipe for more potential adverse events which may affect the children.
Throughout the world, where the hep B vaccine programs were initiated for young children, there has been a significant increase in type 1 diabetes that has been shown through many diverse studies. (Chapter 4 – Solution #4). The prevalence of diabetes type 1 has been shown through these studies to be significantly associated with autism and other disorders. The rise in autism since the hep B vaccine recommendation at birth for newborns is irrefutable.
A question: Why did the CDC decide it was a good idea to place the hep B vaccine on the recommended list for all infants to take immediately after birth? This decision reeks of corruption and conflicts of interest. So why did they decide to do it? What could have been the reasoning? I would like to know the answer to that question because it makes no sense. If we follow the trails of money existing between Big Pharma and the government agencies involved the answers may become clear.
NOTE: I hope you enjoyed this excerpt from my book. There is more information within this book concerning hep B virus and its vaccine, and it can be found in Chapter 4 – Solution #4. In this chapter there are references supporting all the assertions which are made above, and therefore these can be considered as statements of fact. If you are interested in more information on this topic, my book can be found at this link: