After the second month vaccinations were received by my daughter QK, she broke out with a severe case of eczema. I was attempting to figure out what happened to her and what could be done to solve this problem. So, I asked our pediatrician a few questions and received the answers from him. I had not done any research on my own up to this time. To revisit the last blog:
Question #1 and Answer #1:
“It was a little over one month since the first round of shots, and I had some questions for our pediatrician. 1> If she still has this rash, should we wait until this condition clears before we give her more vaccinations? No, he said, we should not wait, she should get her vaccinations on time.”
Eczema is a sign of toxicity. The body is attempting to rid itself of poisons. Eczema is an allergic reaction from the body due to toxins (poisons) in the bloodstream. What do respected doctors say about severe eczema and other allergic reactions in close timing with vaccinations?
Robert Sears M.D., in his book titled The Vaccine Book, stated: “What I do pay closer attention to is the onset of a chronic allergic disorder, like eczema or asthma, in close timing with vaccines. If I see these disorders develop right after the vaccinations, I prefer to hold further doses until the problem goes away. If it is severe, I consider whether or not the possibility of making the allergic disorder worse and possibly lifelong is worth the disease protection offered by the vaccine.” – The Vaccine Book. Robert W. Sears, MD 2019 Third Edition. Pg 203
Here we have prudence and caution being advocated by an esteemed pediatrician practitioner. It is a shame I found this information long after the damage had been done to my daughter. And since we continued with the vaccinations as recommended by our doctor for a few more months, her condition does indeed appear to be a lifelong condition. She is 15 now, and she has constant rhinitis and periodic eczema allergy outbreaks which occur from time to time.
The above quote should also be noted as an excerpt from my book: Louis Pasteur Condemns Big Pharma: Vaccines, Drugs, and Healthcare in the United States. My book can be found here:
Many competent doctors realize that vaccinations cause eczema and other allergy related problems, but they are reluctant to admit it or speak about it. Sometimes doctors and/or their staff will even mock and ridicule the parents of a vaccine injured child for suggesting that the health condition seems to be a result of vaccination, or is a vaccine induced problem. Why, you may ask?
It is because of the profit motive at these pediatric offices. They are paid to push and promote vaccines. At the end of the year, they receive bonuses paid out by pharmaceutical companies and/or insurance companies based on the number and/or percentage of their patients who are vaccinating on time according to CDC schedule. In most offices, if you do not adhere to the CDC recommended vaccine schedule, you will be asked to leave the practice and find another office. They do this because you are affecting their profits and year-end bonuses. These pediatric doctors are being paid to discriminate against patients who choose to delay, refuse, or stop their vaccinations. Isn’t this a conflict of interest, you may ask? Or is it even true?
It is true. This profit motive stops the doctor from considering what is best for the child and their health, and the focus becomes profit for their company. This is wrong. This is unconscionable. This is a conflict of interest, and this practice should be stopped. Pediatric offices should be there for answering questions, providing unbiased advice, and providing a needed service for their patients.
If this overriding goal of maximizing profits by promoting vaccines in their pediatric office seems a little hard to believe, just consider the question I receive every time I am at the doctor’s office: “Would you like to receive your flu shot today?” I asked my family doctor about this. He stated he was required to ask this question because of company policy. More profit is the goal. It is like McDonald’s asking you if you would like to add some fries or a drink to your order.
Question #2 and Answer #2:
“2> Can antibiotics cause any harm to our child? Are there any known problems with giving them to children? No, he said, there are no problems.”
No problems with antibiotics use? Perhaps our pediatrician doesn’t read medical journals or watch the news, or perhaps he is not telling the truth. Or perhaps he does not understand how antibiotics work. I do not know what is in his mind or his heart. But this statement is absolutely false.
Antibiotics kill bacteria. They not only kill bad bacteria which was causing us to be ill, they kill all bacteria, even the good ones that protect us from illness and harm. Antibiotic use causes the body to lower its defenses, leaving it weak and susceptible to disease, infection, and other foreign particles it normally would be capable of handling. Time during and after antibiotic use is a time to be extra careful. It is best to give your body a chance to recover from your sickness and your antibiotic use. This requires time, and the addition of probiotics during this time is recommended.
Mary E. Wilson, MD, a person of renown in the field of infectious diseases wrote a book on the subject of antibiotics. She is a professor at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and the University of California, San Francisco. In this book she makes her points on the use and abuse of antibiotics crystal clear:
“There has been a global surge (more than 65%) in the use of antibiotics between 2000 and 2015, which has led to more reported cases of their side effects. They account for most emergency department visits for kids below the age of 18 years and nearly one out of five emergency department visits in general.” Antibiotics: What Everyone Needs To Know. Mary E. Wilson. 2019. Pg 217-218.
This quote can also be found in my book: Louis Pasteur Condemns Big Pharma: Vaccines, Drugs, and Healthcare in the United States.
With the increase of antibiotics use have come problems which are readily apparent. This goes against what most doctors have come to believe and understand, which is that there are no problems with using antibiotics. Just the statement that “…they account for most emergency department visits for kids…” should in and of itself be eye-opening. And this is just the beginning of the problems of this overuse of antibiotics.
The other glaring problem of recent increased antibiotic use is the growth of anti-microbial resistance (AMR). Over 1 million people per year die because many germs have become resistant to the antibiotics. This is due to excessive antibiotic use. AMR deaths have become increasingly common, and they are still on the rise. It is timely for Dr. Mary Wilson to bring these issues to our attention.
So, for a doctor to say: “There are no problems with antibiotic use” shows that our pediatrician was oblivious to the problems, lives his life with blinders on, or was being disingenuous.
Question #3 and Answer #3:
“3> Could my wife’s diet be a factor in causing my daughter’s allergies and eczema? No, he said. He stated that breastfeeding is not a problem, and my wife can eat anything she wants.”
Even when we went to our friend who is also a doctor, she told us of the dangers of allergic reactions due to what the mother is eating and could be passing on to our child in her breastmilk. It seemed to be common knowledge, and also in hindsight it seemed to be common sense.
Allergies and allergic condition diagnoses have risen to incredible levels since 1986, when the rules changed for vaccines, and pharmaceutical companies were given blanket liability protection from lawsuits from vaccines’ adverse effects. This change of law encouraged Big Pharma to produce more vaccines to be given to our children. And the rise in never heard of childhood diseases suddenly became common enough for our doctor to say about the eczema issue: “Eczema is normal, and many children have it.” Currently, 1 in 5 children have eczema.
Autism was 1 in 10,000 in 1970s, and now it is 1 in 34. Vaccines are the likely factor of cause in this meteoric rise. Big Pharma, which pays for commercial advertising on our news shows and internet channels, appears to have advised the following narrative concerning the undeniable rise in autism: “It is due to genetics, industrial pollution, over-hygienic environments, older women having children, expanded diagnostic criteria, and/or socioeconomic links.”
Big Pharma is willing to accept any explanation other than the obvious one for this dramatic increase in autism and other childhood ailments, which might prevent them from making the money to which they are accustomed. The obvious conclusion is that the recently expanded CDC recommended vaccine schedule is systematically poisoning our children, and these toxic conditions in their blood are giving rise to a host of new and previously unknown or rare conditions that are increasingly becoming more common. The CDC recommended vaccine schedule appears to be causing the current epidemic in childhood diseases in the United States.
Conclusion:
Our pediatrician was not right, he did not look out for the best interests of our child, and our child suffered, and we suffered along with her many itchy and scratch filled nights which could have been avoided if we had sound healthcare and vaccination policies in place in America today.
One of my previous blogs covers some of the details left out here concerning vaccines, antibiotics, yeast overgrowth, probiotics, toxic poisoning and how to detoxify using appropriate foods, supplements, and what things to avoid. The link for this prior blog is here: