In last week’s blog I presented what was happening in my daughter’s pediatric office. We had been officially blocked by the office from seeing the doctor unless we agreed to get caught up on our daughter’s vaccines in accordance with the recommended CDC schedule.
When I voiced concern about these vaccines and expressed my opinion that it was likely that the vaccines had caused my daughter’s allergic conditions of rhinitis and eczema, we were told we did not know what we were talking about, and we were ridiculed for even considering such a belief to be true. Their opinion was that vaccines have been proven to be safe and effective, and anyone who holds a belief other than this does not have a clue.
Something was not right, and I wanted to learn the truth. What I found while doing research on this subject was shocking. The truth is that most pediatric doctors and their offices make money by promoting vaccinations in the form of yearend bonuses by how many or what percentage of patients are receiving their CDC recommended vaccinations on time by insurance companies and/or pharmaceutical companies. This is a blatant conflict of interest.
This fact helped me to understand the attitude of the pediatric doctors and their office staff. Throughout history until now, doctors have always listened to patients’ concerns about their conditions and looked at this as pertinent information to be considered, because sometimes it is not easy to understand what factors cause disease conditions. All information was considered to be possibly relevant information.
But now it is different, doctors and their office staff do not want to hear anything which prevents them from making money. The doctors and their office’s interests have been compromised. They are no longer just serving their patients. Their interests are divided. This has caused them to discriminate against anyone who holds opposing views. These doctors and their offices have been jaded and manipulated into serving the interests of Big Pharma and insurance companies rather than rendering honest opinions and protecting the health and well-being of children. They have chosen to serve money instead of health and truth. It has been said that no man can serve two masters well, and here we have a prime example of this age-old truth.
This led me to my first solution for the healthcare industry in the United States. This solution is an excerpt from my book: Louis Pasteur Condemns Big Pharma: Vaccines, Drugs, and Healthcare in the United States:
“Solution #1. ELIMINATE PAYOFFS IN CLINICS TO PROMOTE VACCINATIONS. It should be illegal for doctors to accept bonuses or other incentives from insurance or pharmaceutical companies for vaccinating patients. This practice is clearly a conflict of interest.
When you take your child to a doctor, you want them to focus on your child and their health, and not on a yearend bonus some other company is paying to push vaccines. These bonuses/kickbacks provide a monetary incentive to the doctor and their office not related to the patient’s health, which is clearly a conflict of interest, and should be illegal. Without this bonus/kickback in their minds, perhaps the doctors can get back in the business of simply taking care of their patients, answering their questions, and providing them with better overall healthcare. If the pediatric office has no money dangling over them in the form of bonuses/kickbacks, then there should be no incentive to bar entrance to any family who wants to receive healthcare, unless the office is so full that they cannot accommodate new patients. This taking away of the bonus/kickback money will remove prejudice and bias against those who do not want to follow the recommended vaccine schedule, or who question the safety of the vaccines. And thereby, all patients will receive equal healthcare service under the law without bias. After all, isn’t this, shouldn’t this be the goal?”
***************
It seemed that Solution #1 was not enough to solve these pediatric office issues. It would take money out of the equation, perhaps, but then the prejudices and one-sided opinions of these offices would still be there for a while. It seemed as if a constitutional principle of equal rights under the law needed to be exercised in some way in order to get the system back on track towards sanity in medical practice and doctor-patient relations.
No one should be discriminated against if they hold opposing beliefs from another regarding medicine and healthcare. Never forget the lesson learned from the master himself, Louis Pasteur. He was laughed at for years by telling doctors to wash their hands between patients because germs invisible to the human eye were being transferred from one patient to another. Almost all the doctors laughed in derision at his beliefs. He bore this ridicule with as much patience as a man can bear, all the while knowing that precious lives were being lost every day due to doctors not listening to good, common sense. And now, washing hands between patients is standard practice.
One can only wonder when common sense will again prevail. The current CDC recommended vaccine schedule appears to be causing the current epidemic in previously rare and unheard-of childhood diseases by promoting an aggressive vaccination policy with too many vaccines being given too soon to infants and toddlers. Statistics do not lie. This system set up in 1986 gives liability protection to vaccine makers, which not only encourages new vaccines and their production and distribution but makes it difficult and sometimes impossible for those who are vaccine injured to get remuneration and justice under the law. While this is happening, since 1986, autism rates have gone up exponentially from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 34. And allergic disorders have risen in a similar way. 1 in 2.5 children have an allergy. Eczema affects 1 in 5 children now. The pediatric doctors and their office staff sometimes ridicule those who have been vaccine injured and laugh in derision, just as Pasteur was laughed at, for voicing what can only be described as an obvious truth that vaccines are causing many of these childhood illnesses.
The healthcare system should allow people to have their own opinions, and to determine the appropriate course of action for their own children. It is the doctor’s duty to offer information, advice and their professional opinion. But it should always be the parents who have the final say and decide the appropriate course of action for those under their care. There should be no threat of being kicked out of a place of business for a difference of opinion. If diversity of opinion flourishes once again, the result will be freedom of thought, more honest and unbiased information, and hopefully in the end truth will reign as it should. Let no doctor or pediatric office discriminate against any individual for holding their own beliefs and choosing to refuse vaccinations, limit vaccinations, or choosing to allow some vaccinations, and/or refusing others for their own child. As a business it should not be possible to refuse service to patients if they choose to act on differences of personal belief.
This is another excerpt from my book: Louis Pasteur Condemns Big Pharma: Vaccines, Drugs, and Healthcare in the United States:
“Solution #2. PRACTICE INFORMED CONSENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Parents and their children should not be refused service by any pediatric office due to their personal beliefs on vaccinations, nor should they be kicked out of these offices for refusal to take any vaccines or by not complying with following the CDC’s recommended vaccine schedule. The doctors should be practicing informed consent, educating parents and children on vaccines and their benefits and risks, and allowing them to decide whether or not they wish to vaccinate.
Conflicts of interest should be removed from these offices, and families should never be forced to ‘follow the vaccine schedule, and keep up with the vaccines, or find a new pediatrician.’ The pediatrician’s job should be to inform and advise, and not to use excessive force or pressure to promote vaccinations. Who is serving who? Parents should have the ultimate authority to decide if and when vaccines should be given to their children.”
The pediatric offices should not rule over the parents and their children. It should not be the pediatric offices way or the highway. Parents should decide what is right for their children. This sentiment will lead us into the next discussion, which concerns Solution #3 in my book. The topic will be parent’s rights.
If you wish to learn more about the 16 Solutions that are proposed in my book, the link to this book can be found here:
LOUIS PASTEUR CONDEMNS BIG PHARMA: Vaccines, Drugs, and Healthcare in the United States